Legal Opinion

Herreid v. Ettrick & Northern Railroad

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1923Published

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

The appeal presents the question whether a town can lawfully vote bonds to aid in the operation and maintenance of a railroad already built and which has been in operation for a number of years. It is contended by the appellant that the provisions of sec. 942, Stats. 1919, authorize the town to lawfully vote and issue bonds for such purpose. The part of the section relied upon reads:

"Any county, town, village or city may, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, issue its negotiable bonds for the purpose of paying for any authorized subscription to the stock or mortgage bonds, or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whiting v. Sheboygan & Fond Du Lac RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Young v. Clarendon TownshipSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Phillips v. Town of AlbanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Lawson v. SchnellenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Town of Platteville v. Galena & Southern Wisconsin RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API