Legal Opinion

Gemignani v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1925No. 4372PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

It is contended on behalf of the plaintiff in error that the court erred in overruling its motion at. the close of the government’s evidence to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the record in case No. 2122 does not show that the defendant was convicted or sentenced upon bis plea of nolo contendere upon tbe second count of tbe information charging him with tbe unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. This plea of nolo contendere’ was entered as to each count of that indictment, and for the purpose of that case was, in effect, a plea of guilty to both counts. Tucker v. U. S., 196 F. 260,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. LairCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. Tucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Cosentino (Two Cases). United States v. MasiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  2. Fisher v. SchilderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  3. In Re the Application for Disciplinary Action Against BoschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Martinez v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  5. State v. CrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API