Legal Opinion · Dissent

Association of Public Agency Customers v. Bonneville Power Administration

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 2013No. 11-73178Published

1Dissent

ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent.

In this matter, we must initially determine whether APAC,1 a group whose members are not direct customers of BPA, has standing to challenge the REP-12 Settlement Agreement. BPA and the inter*969vening parties,2 some of whom supply electricity to APAC’s members, contend that APAC’s members lack standing to bring this challenge because they are not direct customers of BPA. APAC counters that it has standing on account of its members’ cost-based pass-through contracts with the COUs.3 I would deny the petition because it is my view that we lack…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API