United States v. Miguel Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
A jury found Miguel Rodriguez guilty of possession of heroin with intent to distribute, distribution of heroin, and conspiracy both to possess and to distribute heroin. Appellant, through different counsel than the attorney who represented him at all proceedings in the District Court, appeals on the sole ground that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at trial. The law of this Circuit is that claims of inadequate representation cannot be determined on direct appeal where such claims were not raised before the District Court and there has been no opportunity to develop and include in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Gerald Wayne PrinceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Jerry Wayne HunterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Tommy Ray HigdonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. George M. Khoury, Howard Kluver, David W. West, Louis H. ChippasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Gloria AuletCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.