Legal Opinion

Young v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 29, 1988No. 87-1643PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant appeals a judgment of conviction and sentence for manslaughter with a firearm, pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of such charge.

One of the points relied upon by appellant for reversal is that the trial court erred in granting the state’s pretrial motion in limine, thereby restricting appellant’s right to cross-examine the key prosecution witness on matters crucial to that witness’s credibility. We find merit in this contention and reverse and remand for a new trial. See Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 94 S.Ct. 1105, 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974) (defendant’s sixth amendment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Moreno v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Crespo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Lillyman v. DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API