Legal Opinion · Dissent

Department of Transportation v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 6, 1985No. 70550Published

1DissentBenham, Judge

Although I agree with the majority that the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed, I must dissent to the denial of appellee’s motion for damages pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-6.

Where there is no valid reason to expect reversal (Hatchett v. Hatchett, 240 Ga. 103 (239 SE2d 512) (1977)), or where the issues raised have been settled by previous decisions (Pinkerton & Laws Co. v. Robert & Co. Assoc., 129 Ga. App. 881 (201 SE2d 654) (1973)), it is reasonable to conclude that the appeal is taken for delay only. Appellant’s enumerations of error all fall into one or both of those categories.

1. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Favors v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Department of Transportation v. 2.734 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. DendySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Dendy v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Department of Transportation v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API