Arliss Lambdin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Arliss Lambdin, a federal prisoner, filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to have his sentence adjusted by crediting him with 118 days of pretrial confinement. The District Court dismissed the petition and Lambdin appeals.
We affirm for two reasons: A writ of mandamus is not available as a remedy in Lambdin’s situation. Sturm v. McGrath, 177 F.2d 472 (10th Cir.). See also, Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90, 88 S.Ct. 269, 19 L.Ed.2d 305; Rayborn v. Jones, 282 F.2d 410 (6th Cir.).
Lambdin, who was convicted in 1957, and received less than the maximum possible sentence, is not entitled…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sturm v. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. James Delmar DeatonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Benjamin F. Rayborn v. William Jones, Warden, Kentucky State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Personal Restraint of TrambitasWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Thompson v. HemingwayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021