Legal Opinion

Baker v. Odom

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 10, 1975No. 75-110PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carleton Harris, Chief Justice.

Appellees, fifty-nine persons, 1 almost all of whom reside within one mile, most within a quarter or a half mile, of appellants’ dirt motorcycle racetrack, instituted this suit in equity, seeking to enjoin the operation of the track as a private nuisance. Appellants are Mary Baker and her son, Jim Bker, who own the land, and Phillip DuVall and Marion D. Caple, who have leased the property and have developed a motorcycle dirt track. After a hearing, the chancellor granted a temporary restraining order and subsequently on trial of the issues, permanently enjoined…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foreman v. Town of MariannaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  2. Durfey v. ThalheimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Cooper v. WhissenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mears v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Osborne v. PowerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Aviation Cadet Museum, Inc. v. HammerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Higgs v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Mears v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API