Brush Greenhouse Partners v. Godinez
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge PIERCE.*
The issue in this workers’ compensation ease is whether, in determining permanent total disability under § 8-40-201(16.5)(a), C.R.S. (1996 Cum.Supp.), access to employment in the labor market where the claimant resides is a factor to be considered. We conclude that it may be considered and, therefore, affirm the award of permanent total disability benefits to Ernesto Godinez (claimant).
Claimant sustained a compensable back injury while working as a laborer at Brush Greenhouse Partners (employer). His only *1279prior work experience was picking tomatoes. He can neither read…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McKinney v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Best-Way Concrete Co. v. BaumgartnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Christie v. Coors Transportation Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Prestige Painting & Decorating, Inc. v. MitchussonColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Weld County School District Re-12 v. BymerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Spady Bros. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Spady Bros. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Spady Bros. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Weld County School District Re-12 v. BymerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.