Legal Opinion

Brush Greenhouse Partners v. Godinez

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 1997No. 96CA0266PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PIERCE.*

The issue in this workers’ compensation ease is whether, in determining permanent total disability under § 8-40-201(16.5)(a), C.R.S. (1996 Cum.Supp.), access to employment in the labor market where the claimant resides is a factor to be considered. We conclude that it may be considered and, therefore, affirm the award of permanent total disability benefits to Ernesto Godinez (claimant).

Claimant sustained a compensable back injury while working as a laborer at Brush Greenhouse Partners (employer). His only *1279prior work experience was picking tomatoes. He can neither read…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKinney v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Best-Way Concrete Co. v. BaumgartnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Christie v. Coors Transportation Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Prestige Painting & Decorating, Inc. v. MitchussonColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weld County School District Re-12 v. BymerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Spady Bros. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Spady Bros. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Spady Bros. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Weld County School District Re-12 v. BymerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API