Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Savannah River Electric Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 14, 1933No. 13601PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Boni-iam.
Savannah River Electric Company and Twin City Power Company are South Carolina corporations, each having for the object of its creation the development of water power on Savannah River,- in McCormick County, for the purpose of generating electrical current for general -public use. Daniel J. Halpin is trustee, holding certain bonds issued by Twin City Powyer Company. For the sake of brevity let us designate the respondent as the electric company and the appellant corporation as the power company.
March 30, 1929, the electric company…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Haig v. Wateree Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Twin City Power Co. v. Savannah River Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Beaty v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
- Twin City Power Co. v. Savannah River Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Akron, Canton & Youngstown Ry. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- Independence Ins. v. Independent Life & Acc. Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- J. F. Schneider & Son, Inc. v. WattCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
- Murray v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Greenville Enterprise, Inc. v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- In Re Clark's Estate. Brunstetter v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.