Legal Opinion
Seligson v. Russo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered July 21, 2004, which, inter alia, dissolved the parties’ partnership, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs were not estopped from seeking dissolution. Their opposition to a motion to compel them to sell a certain partnership interest to defendants was not inconsistent with their request for dissolution.
In light of defendants’ failure to request an evidentiary hearing, they cannot be heard to argue on appeal that one was required (see e.g. Matter of Quail Aero Serv., 300 AD2d 800, 803 [2002]). In any event, no hearing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Dissolution of T. J. Ronan Paint Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Dissolution of Gordon & Weiss, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Napoli v. DomnitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Napoli v. DomnitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- In re the Dissolution of Quail Aero Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SMD Capital Group LLC v. EPR Capital LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Matter of Brady v. BradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of Perlbinder v. PerlbinderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026