Nelson (Charles) v. State

and (7) whether the State engaged in prosecutorial misconduct.' For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of conviction. As the parties are familiar with the facts of this case, we do not recount them further except as necessary for our disposition. DISCUSSION Substantial evidence supporting the verdict Nelson argues that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury's verdict. We disagree. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we ask "whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the…