Legal Opinion
State v. Lovejoy
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1997No. 1996-0686PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 440.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. LOVEJOY, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Lovejoy,
1997-Ohio-371.] Criminal law—Indictments—Several counts of multi-count indictment are not interdependent—Inconsistency in verdict arises, when—Applicability of double jeopardy and collateral estoppel. 1. The several counts of an indictment containing more than one count are not interdependent and an inconsistency in a verdict does not arise out of inconsistent responses to different counts, but…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. OllerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. CobbOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. Galluzzo, Unpublished Decision (1-20-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. MaggardOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. PriestOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.