Legal Opinion

Aluminum Co. of America v. Celauro

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Chief Justice.

These separate actions were filed by taxpayers in 1986 seeking refund of taxes paid during the years 1983 to 1985. None of the payments were made under protest. Both taxpayers contended that certain provisions of 1986 Tenn.Public Acts, chapter 749, authorized the institution of the actions without the requirement of payment under protest. Considering the cases independently, the Chancellor in each case held that the 1986 statute, generally dispensing with the requirement of payment under protest, did not apply to taxes paid prior to January 1, 1986. We affirm.

A.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stroop v. Rutherford CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. Delinquent Taxpayers as Shown on 1972 Real Property Delinquent Tax Records of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Bowater North America Corp. v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Angel v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Goldsmith's Division, Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. General Motors Corp. v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Chuck's Package Store v. City of MorristownTennessee Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API