Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Weaver

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1989No. 3-89-025-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANNON, Chief Justice.

This appeal concerns the construction of a “no recourse” clause contained in a promissory note that appellants assumed in a general warranty deed.

Appellants Pete Michael Schultz and Edmond Martin seek to set aside a summary judgment rendered by the district court of Tom Green County that appellees recover against appellants personally in a suit for the unpaid balance of a promissory note. This Court will reverse the summary judgment.

Before September 1984, appellees conveyed a tract of land in Lampasas County to R.B. Lewis Company, Inc. and received a promissory note…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Straus v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fein v. R.P.H., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  2. Capitan Enterprises, Inc. v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  3. Old Kent Leasing Services Corp. v. McEwan, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  4. Hondo Oil and Gas Co. v. Texas Crude Operator, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. Brown v. Financial SavingsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API