Legal Opinion
Foster v. Newark Housing Authority
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 21, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
911 A.2d 82 (2006)
389 N.J. Super. 60
David FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent,
v.
NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, and
Newark Housing Authority Housing Police and Estate of Adrian Howell, Defendants.[1]
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 31, 2006.
Decided November 21, 2006.
Edward H. Lee, Springfield, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Pitman, Mindas, Grossman and Lee, attorneys; Mr. Lee, on the brief).
James G. Serritella, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Buttafucco, Arce & Price, attorneys, South…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- O'CONNELL v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Trentacost v. BrusselSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Kolitch v. LindedahlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Roma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Selective Insurance v. Hudson East Pain Management Osteopathic MedicineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Mandal v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Ruiz v. MeroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- SISOLAK v. FORD MOTOR COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019