Legal Opinion
Bartholf v. Hautala
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFloyd E. Anderson, J.
This is a motion by the defendants for a summary judgment against the plaintiffs.
The complaint alleges that on or about May 13, 1959, the defendants gave the plaintiffs an option, in writing, to purchase a two-fifths interest in certain lands described in the complaint. This option provided for a purchase price of $7,000 and stated *47that “ this option shall operate for a period of 60 days.” The complaint further alleges: “ 4. That thereafter and on or about the 15th day of May, 1959 while the said option remained in full force and effect plaintiffs duly served notice upon the defendants herein…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Heller v. PopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Elsfelder v. CournandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Gram v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Beaumont v. PrietoSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Texas Co. v. Z. & M. Independent Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leasing Service Corporation v. River City Construction, Inc., and Welborn DentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Eastern Systems, Inc. v. West 45th Street Industrial Condominiums, Inc. (In Re Eastern Systems, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Piazza v. SutherlandNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Rebhun v. Executive Equipment Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1977
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Westside Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967