Mandigo v. Healey
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Trover, for a stock of goods. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted to the denial of his motions for nonsuit and direction of a verdict, to instructions given, and to the refusal of the court to give certain instructions requested.
1Opinion of the CourtParsons, J.
The defendant claims to hold the goods by virtue of an attachment upon sundry writs against Prank Newton & Co. Prior to March 22, 1895, Newton & Co. carried on a meat and provision business. On that day they sold and transferred their stock, fixtures, and business to Ella P. Mandigo, who was-called in the bill of sale Ella P. Mandigo & Co. Ella P. Mandigo was the wife of Elmer M. Mandigo, who with Prank Newton constituted the firm of Newton & Co. The business was-thereafter carried on by Elmer for Ella, as was claimed, under the name of E. P. Mandigo & Co. April 6, 1895, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Verplank v. SterryCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1815
- Clinkinbeard v. ClinkinbeardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
- Kendall v. SamsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
- Coty v. BarnesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
- Gilbert v. DeckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.