Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 12, 1915PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

OpinioN op the Court by

Judge Hannah

Reversing.

Richard Wallace was convicted under an indictment charging him with the statutory offense of housebreaking.

He appeals, contending that the offense charged in the indictment was not sufficiently proven, and that the court erred in instructing the jury.

1. In instructing the jury the court authorized a conviction without requiring proof of the execution of the felonious intent to steal, by the actual stealing and carrying away of property of value from the dwelling house in question.

*86It was held in Drake v. Commonwealth, 31 R., 1286, 104 S. W., 1000,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Farris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  3. Little v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dunn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  2. Broughton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  3. Runyon v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Hunt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  5. Schwyhart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API