Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of Atlanta v. AMR Group Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided November 13, 1986No. Civ. A. CV686-078Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOWEN, District Judge.
First National Bank of Atlanta (“FNBA”), a lender and secured creditor in the consolidated case captioned In re Rusco Industries, No. 686-00031, has filed both a notice of appeal and a motion for leave to appeal an interlocutory order pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 8003. FNBA seeks to appeal an adverse discovery ruling entered by the bankruptcy judge. In addition, the AMR Group, Inc., the unsecured creditor committee, and the committee of equity security holders have moved for leave to cross appeal from that portion of the same discovery order which adversely affected…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- In the Matter of International Horizons, Inc., Debtor. International Horizons, Inc., and Touche Ross & Company v. The Committee of Unsecured CreditorsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- In Re Regency Woods Apartments, LtdCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Branch v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Rouse Construction International, Inc. v. Rouse Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982