Chappuis & Chappuis v. Kaplan

Plaintiffs are attorneys at law and herein sue for their fee in defending the case of La. State Rice Milling Co. v. Kaplan, 168 La. 50, 121 So. 188.

I

That suit was one against this defendant alone to compel him to accept title to, and pay the price for, certain property; and was decided favorable to this defendant.

The defendant excepted for “non-joinder” of a necessary party defendant, to wit, one Leo Reiman, whom defendant claims to have been associated with him in the agreement to purchase said property and to have been interested therein to the extent of one-half.

In Gill et al. v. City of…