Legal Opinion

Bowrys v. Santanella

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 23, 1983No. File 269947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

The defendant in the present action seeks to have the plaintiffs’ substitute complaint stricken in its entirety because it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Both named parties are members of the Enfield police department. On March 8, 1980, while on duty, the named plaintiff, Frank E. Bowrys, in attempting to stop a motor vehicle, was dragged by the motor vehicle and fell to the ground. He was then hit by a police cruiser which was in pursuit of the motor vehicle. The defendant was the driver of the police cruiser. The defendant specifically objects to the substitute…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kowal v. HofherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Fraser v. HenningerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Menzie v. KalmonowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Bania v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Edmundson v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rowe v. GodouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Durkin v. First Healthcare Corp., No. 88-350622 (Oct. 18, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990
  3. McAuliffe v. Burill Construction, No. Cv-90-374419 (Aug. 24, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API