Legal Opinion

Anskis v. Fischer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1982No. 760PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Following trial in this trespass case, the jury returned a $150,000 verdict for appellant against the additional defendants, Michael Lenahan and Sears, Roebuck & Co., and found for defendants, Selma and Louis Fischer, against appellant. The additional defendants promptly moved to have the verdict molded because appellant’s claim was barred under the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, art. Ill, § 303, as amended; 77 P.S. § 481. The lower court granted their motion and entered the following order:

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 1978, upon Motion…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Nether Providence Township School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Levin v. Desert Palace, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Gaertner v. F. Jay Smith, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Hayes v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. HurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Vogelsberger v. Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Dream Pools of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. BaehrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Miller v. HurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API