Legal Opinion

Xanthull v. Beto

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 14, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 67-G-141PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:

NOEL, District Judge.

Petitioner, a prisoner in state custody, has moved through his appointed counsel for an order requiring this Court to order reimbursement of a psychiatrist for his professional services. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been granted, in this Court only.

In his motion petitioner has pleaded that “inasmuch as the testimony of one Dr. Benjamin Sher at the Baylor Medical School, Houston, Texas, is an essential factor in Plaintiff’s habeas corpus proceeding, due to the fact that Dr. Sher examined Plaintiff at or near the time of the commission of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. William Estep v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. Roy Helwig v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, Western State Penitentiary, Pittsburgh 33, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. United States Ex Rel. Helwig v. CavellDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. United States v. NewsomeDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dortly v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1977
  2. McDowell v. MooreDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API