Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Laney

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 31, 1965No. 5-3538PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Johnson, Associate Justice.

This is an unemployment compensation case.

The appellants are employees of the International Shoe Company. In the summer of 1963, the shoe company ceased operation of their factories for a two week plantwide vacation shutdown. Appellants had not worked for the company long enough to he entitled to a vacation. During this two week period, appellants performed no work and received no vacation pay or other remuneration from their employer. Appellants initiated or continued claims for benefits under the Arkansas Employment Security Act. From the record it appears…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. New Madrid Manufacturing Company, a Corporation, and Harold Jones, an Individual, D/B/A Jones Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  2. Teichler v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Holland v. Malvern Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Prince Poultry Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Sallee Bros. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bradford v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Osterhout v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Oxford v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  4. In the Interest of A.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Stover v. DeereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API