Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Moore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 2016No. COA16-493Published

1Dissent

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge, Dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority affirming the trial court and revoking Defendant's probation. Instead, I would vacate the trial court's judgment ex mero motu for lack of jurisdiction.

In probation revocations, the requirement of notice is imperative. Absent adequate notice, the trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. State v. Kornegay , 228 N.C.App. 320, 322, 745 S.E.2d 880, 882 (2013) (citing State v. Tindall , 227 N.C.App. 183, 187, 742 S.E.2d 272, 275 (2013) ). To provide adequate notice, the "probation officer [must] specifically…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TindallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. KornegayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. HancockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API