Legal Opinion

Liebert v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 8, 1959No. 63423; protests 58/388, etc. (Seattle)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Fobd, Judge:

When this matter was called for trial, the cases listed in schedule “A,” annexed hereto and made a part hereof, were consolidated for the purpose of trial.

These consolidated protests covered three different items which are described as Palmia No. 1 and No. 2 food grinder or mink food grinder, which is hereinafter referred to as a mink food grinder; a mink food mixer; and an item described either as a minkomatie pelt flesher,.a minkomatic fleshing machine, or a mink fleshing machine, which is hereinafter referred to as a mink fleshing machine. All of these items were classified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Liebert v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. William H. Masson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API