Liebert v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Fobd, Judge:
When this matter was called for trial, the cases listed in schedule “A,” annexed hereto and made a part hereof, were consolidated for the purpose of trial.
These consolidated protests covered three different items which are described as Palmia No. 1 and No. 2 food grinder or mink food grinder, which is hereinafter referred to as a mink food grinder; a mink food mixer; and an item described either as a minkomatie pelt flesher,.a minkomatic fleshing machine, or a mink fleshing machine, which is hereinafter referred to as a mink fleshing machine. All of these items were classified…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Liebert v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
3Cited by1 opinion
- William H. Masson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971