Augustine v. Wolf
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 187, 188, 189, 190, 191 and 192, April T., 1905, by defendants, from orders of C. P. Fayette Co., June T., 1894, Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 11, discharging rules to open judgments in case of Jasper Augustine to use of Daniel Augustine, for use of Jasper Augustine v. Joseph Wolf. Rules to open judgments. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Errors assigned were the orders of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Smith, J.,
The issue presented in the court below arose on the petition of the defendant and the answer of the plaintiff, and was heard and decided on depositions submitted to Judge O’Connor, specially presiding. The matters discussed before us relate to several transactions which may have been heard and passed upon by the referee, John B. Head, Esq., whose report was approved by the lower court and the Supreme Court: Wolf v. Augustine, 197 Pa. 367. But whether all the questions now presented were included in that proceeding, is one of the points here argued and upon which this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Halstead v. GrinnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Shannon v. CastnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Charles D. Kaier Co. v. O'brienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Schomaker v. DeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Augustine v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Green Ridge Bank v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- FLAGSHIP FIRST NAT. BANK, ETC. v. BloomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Miller's PetitionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Schuylkill Trust Co. v. Haupt Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.