Legal Opinion

New York Edison Co. v. McDonald

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 15, 1907Published

Motion for a bill of particulars.

1Opinion of the CourtWadhams, J.

The action is brought to recover the cost to plaintiff of caring for, repairing and changing its wires, cables, structures and underground service near Lenox *64avenue, made necessary by reason of the construction of subsection No. 8 of the subway. Motion is made for a bill of particulars by the defendants Farrell and Hopper. In their answer they admit entering into a contract with the defendant McDonald for the construction of subsection No. 8, and that they in turn subcontracted with the defendant Rodgers for part of this section. The demand for the bill of particulars contains ten paragraphs.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Constable v. HardenberghNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Messer v. AaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Case v. . PharisNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Williams v. ShawNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Slingerland v. International Contracting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API