Legal Opinion
Cannon v. Ormet Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 1985No. CA 84 0959PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
The question presented on appeal is whether or not it was correct for the trial court to enter a Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict in an action on an insurance contract finding the plaintiff was not enti-*557tied to disability benefits, penalties, or attorney’s fees.
The plaintiff, George R. Cannon, filed suit on August 15,1973, naming as defendants his employer, Ormet Corporation, and the Prudential Insurance Company of America. The plaintiff alleged in his petition he was entitled to certain disability insurance benefits provided by his employer through a group disability…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crowe v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Foret v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Jones v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. Trustmark InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- Phillippe v. Commercial Insurance Co. of NewarkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Cannon v. Ormet Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986