Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Estate of Best

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1985Published

1DissentJasen, J.

I would hold that statutory law and the unqualified use of the term "issue” in the testatrix’s will compels the conclusion that her adopted-out grandson is entitled to an equal share of the trust fund the testatrix created under her will.

Adoption was unknown to the common law and is solely a creature of statute. (See, Matter of Robert Paul P., 63 NY2d 233, 237; Matter of Thorne, 155 NY 140, 143.) New York’s adoption laws, first enacted in 1873, initially provided that an adopted child had no right of inheritance from the adoptive parents (L 1873, ch 830, § 10). Several years later, adopted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. In Re the Accounting of the United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. In re the Adoption of Malpica-OrsiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Carpenter v. . Buffalo General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Brantingham v. HuffNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API