Legal Opinion

Callahan v. Holsman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 4, 1953No. Gen. 46,031PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schwartz

The complaint in this case charged that certain defendants, other than appellants, promoted and created what is called a “Mutual Development Trust”; that they sold beneficial interests therein to plaintiffs and others, and thereafter fraudulently caused to be executed a second mortgage trust deed on the trust property, to secure a note for $80,000 issued to themselves, and sold and transferred the same to defendants Samuel L. Rosenblatt and Joseph G. Engert, hereinafter referred to as appellants. The only charge against appellants is that they knew “that the execution of the purported second…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Casualty Co. v. Caswell & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  2. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Cook Lumber Terminal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  3. Hulse v. NashIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Malnick v. RosenthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  5. Grabowski v. MacLaskeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weingart v. WeingartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  2. Capitol Records, Inc. v. Vee Jay Records, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Board of the County Commissioners v. First National Bank of ThermopolisWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  4. J. H. Walters & Co. v. Canham Sheet Metal Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  5. Callahan v. HolsmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API