Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Dutney
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided June 14, 1976PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Dutney and Grondine (defendants) have been convicted by a jury on separate indictments laid under the provisions of G. L. c. 268A, §§ 2(6), 3(6) and 17 (a) , 2 respectively, and both have appealed. We consider those assignments of error (G. L. c. 278, § 33D) which are grounded on exceptions (Commonwealth v. Hall, 369 Mass. 715, 717 [1976]), which have been argued (Rule 1:13 of the Appeals Court, as amended effective February 27, 1975, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 801), which have merit, and which are directed to questions which seem likely to arise upon the retrial which we hold is required.
1. We…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. SandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Kuklis v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Commonwealth v. FarrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Commonwealth v. DominicoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- United States v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Francis E. DevinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John M. Arruda, United States of America v. Edward RinglandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.