B-W Acceptance Corp. v. Torgerson
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
On August 4, 1964, defendants filed a. motion for summary judgment. Briefs were filed by the respective parties. At a hearing on September 8, the court raised the question as to whether the-“abstention doctrine” might be applicable and called attention to the cases hereinafter cited. Counsel were given an opportunity to file additional memoranda on the application of this doctrine. The. court has received a letter from counsel for the defendants, and counsel for the-plaintiff has advised the court that he has found no authorities in point contrary to those cited herein.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of ThibodauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Liquifin Aktiengesellschaft v. BrennanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974