State v. Holden
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGELY, Justice:
Plaintiff-Below/Appellant, the State of Delaware, appeals from a Superior Court order granting a motion to suppress by the Defendants-Below/Appellees Michael Holden and Lauren Lusby (collectively, “Holden”) on grounds that the search warrant affidavit approved by the magistrate failed to establish probable cause. We hold that the magistrate had a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed to search Holden’s home for contraband or evidence of a crime. Accordingly, we reverse the Superior Court judgment granting the motion to suppress.
*1112 Facts and Procedural History
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Rybicki v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Valentine v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
- Everett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2021
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.