Legal Opinion

EDIE BRITMAN VS. FRANK SAURO (FM-10-0129-04, HUNTERDON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 1, 2019No. A-2979-16T4/A-3659-16T4Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-2979-16T4 A-3659-16T4 EDIE BRITMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANK SAURO, Defendant-Respondent, and BUDD LARNER, PC, Defendant/Intervenor- Respondent. ______________________________ EDIE BRITMAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FRANK SAURO,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Newburgh v. ArrigoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Lombardi v. MassoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  3. Johnson v. Cyklop Strapping Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  4. Ducey v. DuceyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API