Legal Opinion

Pohl Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 29, 1991No. 700-88TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This case is before the court on its own order requesting the parties to brief it on the issue of whether the court must issue an opinion when defendant, following trial, conceded that plaintiff was correct in its position and entitled to a tax refund for the full amount asserted in its complaint.

FACTS

On May 12, 1985, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a statutory notice of deficiency to plaintiff Pohl Corporation for the 1981 calendar year. On May 30, and December 30, 1986, plaintiff paid the IRS $9,443.00 and $204,500.00 respectively, representing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pohl Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. McIlvaine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Blakley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API