Legal Opinion

Card Technology Corp. v. DataCard Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 21, 2008No. Civil No. 05-CV-02546PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on DefendanVCounterclaim Plaintiffs Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions. [Docket No. 164].

II. BACKGROUND

A. Parties

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Card Technology Corporation (“CTC”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Paramus, New Jersey. CTC provides solutions for card personalization, including “smart cards.”

Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Data-card Corporation (“DataCard”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Minnetonka, Minnesota.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Dwight W. Keefer v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Barnett v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. ASI, Inc. v. Aquawood, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
  3. Aviva Sports, Inc. v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  4. Bakambia v. SchnellDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  5. Barnett v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API