Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. Heffernan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Under the sections of the Ohio Code relating to husband and wife, Section 7995 et seq., the wife had the right of property in and was the owner of the sedan; and it must be conceded that, although living apart, they were still husband and wife. The alimony decree did not affect that relation.
It is contended by counsel for the insurance company that since this court, in State v. Phillips, 85 Ohio St., 317, 97 N. E., 976, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.), 142, Ann. Cas., 1913B, 250, decided that a husband could not be convicted for larceny of the wife’s property, there could be no theft of the sedan within…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Mazzilli v. Acc. & Cas. Ins. Co. of WinterthurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Munchick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
- Fleming v. Travelers InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
- Crossfield v. Phoenix Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Casualty Underwriters, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.