Legal Opinion

Trudell v. Heilman

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1984No. B001441PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.

This is an action for damages for “embracery” and emotional distress, brought by the plaintiff in a former action for personal injury, against one of the defendants in that action and one of the jurors in that action. The trial court sustained, without leave to amend, a demurrer to that complaint. Plaintiff has appealed; we affirm.

The gist of plaintiff’s complaint is stated as follows:

“4. On or about July 22, 1982, Defendants, and each of them, conspired to deprive Plaintiff of his full and fair day in court and of a fair jury verdict in the negligence action. On…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Trevino v. OrtegaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. OMI Holdings, Inc. v. HowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. LaBarre v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. OMI Holdings, Inc. v. HowellDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Trevino v. OrtegaTexas Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API