Commonwealth v. Monarch
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 7 — INDICTMENT— CITED Revised Statutes, secs. 6, 10, chap. 42, 1 Stanton, 568-5. CITED Revised Statutes, 1 Stanton, 568-4.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Williams
This was an indictment against appellee for “setting up and keeping a keno-table, committed as follows: that he did on-day of-, 1868,-and on divers days since, in the county aforesaid, procure to be set up and to be kept a keno-table in a house under his control and in his occupation; . . it being a contrivance for betting, at which and whereby money and property was bet, won, and lost.”
It is not averred that this is a contrivance ordinarily used for gaming; nor that it was indeed a banking game kept for the ordinary purpose of betting, winning, and losing. This kind of table or contrivance…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Black v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Waddell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
- Rader v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Wilson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879