Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Monarch

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 9, 1869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case 7 — INDICTMENT— CITED Revised Statutes, secs. 6, 10, chap. 42, 1 Stanton, 568-5. CITED Revised Statutes, 1 Stanton, 568-4.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Williams

This was an indictment against appellee for “setting up and keeping a keno-table, committed as follows: that he did on-day of-, 1868,-and on divers days since, in the county aforesaid, procure to be set up and to be kept a keno-table in a house under his control and in his occupation; . . it being a contrivance for betting, at which and whereby money and property was bet, won, and lost.”

It is not averred that this is a contrivance ordinarily used for gaming; nor that it was indeed a banking game kept for the ordinary purpose of betting, winning, and losing. This kind of table or contrivance…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Black v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Waddell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
  3. Rader v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. Wilson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API