Lupo v. Long
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
The appellant Lupo appeals from the denial of his petition for contempt brought against Long. We affirm.
1. "Since an application for contempt does not come within the definition of a pleading, it is necessarily a motion as defined in Code Ann. § 81A-107(b), and the provisions of Code Ann. § 81A-152 which require findings of fact and conclusions of law by the trial court, are not applicable to motions.’’ Hines v. Hines, 237 Ga. 755, 756 (229 SE2d 744) (1976). There is no merit in the enumeration complaining of the court’s failure to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Sub…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hines v. HinesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pettus v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Berger v. North American Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Valley v. South Atlantic Conference of Seventh-Day Adventist.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018