Legal Opinion

Inland Motor Freight, Inc. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided October 17, 1956No. Civ. No. 1293Published

1Opinion of the Court

LINDBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Inland Motor Freight, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Inland, seeks *276to set aside a cease and desist order of the Interstate Commerce Commission directing Inland not to perform such operations as were found by the Commission to be beyond the scope of Inland’s Certificate MC-59077.

The controversy developed with the filing of a complaint on September 29, 1953 by Portland-Pendleton Motor Transportation Company and Consolidated Freightways, Inc. against Inland under Section 204 of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 304, charging Inland with engaging in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Malone Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1952
  5. Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API