Legal Opinion
Martin v. Musteen
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 19, 1990No. 90-126PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
This is an appeal from denial of information sought pursuant to the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Ark. Code Ann. §§25-19-101 through 25-19-107 (1987 and Supp. 1989). William Leon Pinson was charged with manufacture and delivery of a controlled substance as well as possession of drug paraphernalia. His lawyer, John Lee Martin, Jr., the appellant, sought from appellee Dennis Musteen, who is the Chief of Police of Rogers, Arkansas, the police investigation file with respect to the charges against Pinson. Chief Musteen consulted with appellee David S. Clinger,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCambridge v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- City of Fayetteville v. RoseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
3Cited by31 opinions
- Johninson v. StodolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Hengel v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Nabholz Construction Corp. v. Contractors for Public Protection Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Byrne v. EagleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Department of Arkansas State Police v. Keech Law Firm, P.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.