School City of Lafayette v. Bloom
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Tippecanoe Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The appellee, Hattie B. Bloom, in her complaint against the appellant, filed on the 22d day of March, 1895, showed that she was employed by the board of school trustees of the city of Lafayette, on the 31st day of May, 1894, by written contract, to teach in one of the grades in the school buildings of said city for the term of ten months, being the school year commencing on the 10th of September, 1894, at the rate of $50.00 per month. The inability of the appellee to set out a copy of the contract was shown, and *462it was further shown that on the 8th of June, 1894, she was notified in writing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farrell v. School-District No. 2Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Crawfordsville v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Reubelt v. School TownIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Jackson School Township v. SheraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- School Town v. PownerIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Indiana Ex Rel. Anderson v. BrandSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bruck v. State Ex Rel. MoneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Hornbeck v. State ex rel. DavidsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Indiana Ex Rel. Anderson v. BrandSupreme Court of the United States · 1938