Shock v. State

Appellant was convicted of the rape of a girl eleven years old. He was tried by the court without a jury, was found guilty, and was sentenced to imprisonment for life. Overruling his motion that he be discharged, his motion in arrest of judgment, and his motion for a new trial are assigned as errors.

By the motion for a new trial, he seeks to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence' to sustain the finding, but none of the evidence is in the record. The order-book entries recite that on February 19, 1924, at the February, 1924, term of court, the motion for a new trial was overruled, when…