Legal Opinion

State v. Beery

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1930No. 27,984Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction. He was prosecuted in municipal court upon a complaint charging him with the violation of an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis, which provides:

“Any person or persons,who shall make, aid, countenance or assist in making any noise, riot, disturbance or improper diversion, and all persons who shall collect in bodies or crowds in said city, for unlawful purposes or to the annoyance or disturbance of the citizens or travelers, shall, for each offense, on conviction before the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis, be liable * * etc.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Friederick v. Skellet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API