Legal Opinion

Farlin v. Hill

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1902No. 1,396PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge. INJUNCTION bj William L. Farlin against William L. Hill, county treasurer of Silver Bow county, to restrain the selling •of property for a sewer assessment. From an order dissolving a restraining order and refusing an injunction, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Milburn

In 1891 plaintiff and appellant, being then the owner of the Columbia lode claim, in Silver Bow county, outside of the "boundaries of the city of Butte, — that is, entirely without the limits and beyond the dominion of the city, — 'caused to be surveyed and platted a certain part of the said lode claim, as appears from the agreed statement of facts, the part of which •material to this opinion being as follow®:

“It is stipulated by and between the parties to the above-■entitled action that the same may be submitted to the court *29upon tlie following agreed statement of facts, which embraces all…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. FearCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sharkey v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Pool v. Town of TownsendMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State v. WebberMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. McCandless v. Waiahole Water Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Edmonds Land Co. v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API