Legal Opinion

Hedegard v. BE&K

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 19, 2005No. 2040015PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Judge.

Richard Hedegard appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Mobile Circuit Court in favor of BE&K1 in his action *316against it for alleged discrimination in violation of the Alabama Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Ala.Code 1975, §§ 25-1-20 to -29 (“the AADEA”). We affirm.

On September 13, 2001, BE&K terminated Hedegard’s employment. On January 31, 2002, Hedegard filed a charge of discrimination with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“the EEOC”) in which he alleged that BE&K’s termination of his employment constituted age discrimination in violation of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Jones v. Dillard's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. WATER WORKS AND SEWER BOARD OF SELMA v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Ex Parte JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lambert v. Mazer Discount Home Centers, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  2. Hobbs v. US Xpress IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API