Wendell v. Central Power and Light Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1DissentKennedy, Justice
I respectfully dissent. For the reasons hereinafter stated, I am of the opinion that the trial amendment should have been allowed and that the jury should have been allowed to answer appellant’s requested special issues concerning such trial amendment. I would reverse and remand.
Appellants, by their first point of error, complain of the trial court’s refusal to permit a trial amendment and the submission of related special issues. Appellant asserts that the issues were tried by consent and that a trial amendment should have been allowed to conform the pleadings to the proof under TEX.R.CIV.P.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Hardin v. HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Bednarz v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1963
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.