Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wendell v. Central Power and Light Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 28, 1984No. 13-82-362-CVPublished

1DissentKennedy, Justice

I respectfully dissent. For the reasons hereinafter stated, I am of the opinion that the trial amendment should have been allowed and that the jury should have been allowed to answer appellant’s requested special issues concerning such trial amendment. I would reverse and remand.

Appellants, by their first point of error, complain of the trial court’s refusal to permit a trial amendment and the submission of related special issues. Appellant asserts that the issues were tried by consent and that a trial amendment should have been allowed to conform the pleadings to the proof under TEX.R.CIV.P.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hardin v. HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Bednarz v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1963

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API